|
Published: February 29, 2008
"Pornography is harmless fun"
Planned Parenthood promoting smut on web site aimed at teens
A Planned Parenthood web site for teenagers is promoting pornography to young people, Cybercast News Service reports. An article posted on the Planned Parenthood-sponsored Teenwire.com web site advises teens that pornography is a “lower-risk form of outercourse.”
“Many couples can read or watch sexy stories or pictures together," the article, originally posted on Teenwire.com in 2007, states. "They can also share or act out sex fantasies.”
Another piece of advice on the website, “Porn vs. Reality,” warns that it is against federal law for anyone under 18 to view pornography. But, says the article, “not everyone follows the rules, and you may run across some porn before you turn 18.”
Many people enjoy pornography “alone or with a partner,” says the article. “People have different ideas of what is arousing, and there are many different kinds of porn that appeal to people's different interests."
On the Teenwire.com web site’s “Ask the Experts” page, one writer assures a student concerned that pornography use will affect his grades that “there is no correlation between using pornography and getting bad grades in school.” The “expert” assured another teenager that masturbation and pornography use did not constitute cheating on his girlfriend.
Cris Clapp, congressional liaison for the anti-pornography group Enough is Enough, told Cybercast News Service that the web site lacks key information. “Overall teenwire.com has painted a picture that pornography is harmless fun," she said. Clapp noted that Internet pornography includes very graphic content, including violent sexual images.
Clapp cited the Nov. 10, 2005 congressional testimony of author and family therapist Jill Manning, who said, "Children and adolescents are considered the most vulnerable audience of sexually explicit material."
Manning told congress that youth are easily coerced into viewing or producing pornography, and have a limited ability to process material they encounter, whether voluntarily or involuntarily. They can be victims of others’ pornography consumption, and their sexual and social development can be negatively affected by exposure to false or traumatic messages about sexuality and relationships. Pornography also encourages unrealistic expectations in youth about their future relationships.
"However, this legal reality is rapidly losing momentum as widespread availability and accessibility of pornography normalizes illegal exposure," Manning said.
Clapp told Cybercast News Service parents need to be involved in the education of their children. "Unfortunately, parents are outsourcing their responsibility to talk to their kids about healthy sexuality to teachers, the culture and sites like teenwire.com, without any understanding about the sort of misguided messages that our children are hearing," said Clapp.
(This is an edited version of a story provided courtesy of Catholic News Agency.)
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 6:51 AM By ann
Ah yes. Bread, circuses and rutting. Guaranteed to make you healthy, wealthy and wise. And, keep you off the back of your masters.
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 8:38 AM By The other Mike
Talk about "progressive". Planned Parenthood has always endorsed birth control and abortion. Now they endorse illegal pornography for teens. What's next? Cocktails for Children? Roofies for Rugrats? Perversion is a bottomless pit.
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 10:16 AM By Fr. M.P.
More marketing of sin, all under the guise of "freedom" and "rights." More work for us to get the real truth promulgated.
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 10:39 AM By John F. Maguire
I would endorse the decision of John Paul II to refer to "video porn" as "pornovision" rather than rely upon the broader term "pornography." This papal decision is to be recommended from many points of view, not least legal, given that the original error in this nation's First Amendment jurisprudence on this topic was to conflate the two terms. The porn industry is a product of this Supreme Court mistake.
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 10:40 AM By Maria Gracia
It sounds like Planned Parenthood is targeting future markets for their horrible culture of death services.
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 11:23 AM By SNoel
I feel sorry for the children growing up in this era. I call on
St. Michael the Archangel to protect their minds from evil.
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 11:33 AM By JimAroo
You think this is bad? Go to their actual site teenwire.com
This porn article is just te tip of the iceberg - promotion of contraception, masturbation, fornication, for teens!!!
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 4:52 PM By Papamac
Planned Parenthood is funded each year with hundreds of millions of FEDERAL DOLLARS, in short, WE PAY FOR THEIR SMUT WITH OUR TAX MONEY...HILARIOUS CLINTON AND BABBHLINGBABAMA BOTH SAY IT IS PERFECTLY OK WITH THEM, THEY SEE NO PROBLEM WITH SMUT BEING FORCE FED TO OUR CHILDREN, THEY SEE NO PROBLEM GIVING THE HOMOSEXUALS ANOTHER AVENUE TO GET AT OUR CHILDREN, DO YOU?? VOTE FOR MORALLY PROVEN CANDIDATES, NOT FOR SPIRITUALLY CORRUPT JACKASSES WHO HAVE SOLD THEIR SOULS. CANNOT THE GOVERNMENT USE THAT MONEY TO FEED THE POOR, CLOTH THE NAKED, GIVE HEALTH CARE TO THE NEEDY, IT IS OUR MONEY, WHY SHOULD WE ACCEPT IT BEING USED TO PROMOTE THE SODOMITE AGENDA....JUST A PASSING THOUGHT...MGB
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 5:25 PM By Bob L
The law that applies to porn is mute when it comes to prosecution. How is viewing of this material by teens any different than viewing child porn by devious adults? Are we entering another Sodom & Gomorrha age? Teenwire & Planned Parenthood will definitely have to answer for these atrocities & the havoc they reek on young imaginations........
|
Posted Friday, February 29, 2008 6:14 PM By John L. Sillasen
So, when this program is ok'd by govt, does it mean that all the child porn prisoners will be set free?
|
Posted Saturday, March 01, 2008 9:51 PM By John L. Sillasen
I can see it now; it will be like the annual running of the bulls in Pamplona. Thousands of child porn convicts instantly reprieved and set loose in society. They'll literally stampede through the gates of the prisons into the freedom of the general public, here and there a child being trampled into the ground.
|
Posted Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:47 PM By Kenneth M. Fisher
Why did Pope John Paul II accept Roger Mahony's request for Papal Knighthood for Ruppert Murdoch, the man the L.A. Times called King of Internet Porn?
God bless, yours in Their Hearts.
Kenneth M. Fisher
|
Posted Wednesday, March 05, 2008 6:55 AM By John L. Sillasen
Nobody told the late Pope???
|
© California Catholic Daily 2008. All Rights Reserved.
|